Times new roman font become designed by using Victor Lardent in collaboration with the British Branch of the printing system agency Monotype Imaging. This is a serif typeface which is commissioned through the british newspaper the times in 1931. You can download this font for free. Well, that's all good. But if Times New Roman is installed, plt.rcParams'font.family' = 'Times New Roman' should work nonetheless. Or inversely, putting 'Times New Roman' at the top of the list, will not suddenly make this work if it didn't already work before. – ImportanceOfBeingErnest Oct 5 '18 at 22:03.
![]() ![]()
Canonical serif font Times New RomanMixedCommissioned byDate released1932Design based onTimes New Roman is a designed for use in. It was commissioned by the British newspaper in 1931 and conceived by, the artistic adviser to the British branch of the printing equipment company, in collaboration with, a lettering artist in the Times' advertising department. Although no longer used by The Times, Times New Roman is still very common in book and general printing.
It has become one of the most popular and influential typefaces in history and a standard typeface on desktop computers.Times New Roman's creation took place through the influence of of. Morison was an artistic director at Monotype, historian of printing and informal adviser to The Times. Asked to advise on a redesign, he recommended that they change their text typeface from a spindly and somewhat dated nineteenth-century face to a more robust, solid design, returning to traditions of printing from the eighteenth century and before. This matched a common trend in printing tastes of the period.The new face was drawn by Victor Lardent, an artist from the advertising department of The Times, with Morison consulting, before refinement by the Monotype drawing office. Morison proposed an older Monotype typeface named as a basis for the design, and Times New Roman mostly matches Plantin's dimensions.
The main change was that the contrast between strokes was enhanced to give a crisper image. As a typeface designed for newspaper printing, Times New Roman has a high, short to allow tight linespacing and a relatively condensed appearance. The new design made its debut in The Times on 3 October 1932. After one year, the design was released for commercial sale. Although Morison may not have literally drawn the design, his influence on its concept was sufficient that he felt that he could take credit for it as 'my one effort at designing a font'. In Times New Roman's name, Roman is a reference to the regular or style (sometimes also called ), the first part of the Times New Roman family to be designed. Roman type has roots in Italian printing of the late 15th and early 16th centuries, but Times New Roman's design has no connection to or to the.The Times stayed with Times New Roman for 40 years, but new production techniques and the format change from to in 2004 have caused it to switch typeface five times from 1972 to 2007.
However, all the new fonts have been variants of the original New Roman typeface. Once released for commercial sale, Times New Roman became extremely successful, becoming Monotype's best-selling typeface of all time in metal type. A Ludlow Typograph specimen of Times New Roman Type Specimen from the metal type period.
The design was altered in smaller sizes to increase readability, particularly obvious in the widened spacing of the six and eight point samples at centre right of the diagram. The hollows at the top of upstrokes are also not seen in the standard digitisations.Times New Roman has a robust on the page and influences of European and printing. The design is slightly condensed, with short and and a high (tall lower-case letters), all effects that save space and increase clarity.The roman style of Plantin was loosely based on a metal type created in the late sixteenth century by the French artisan and preserved in the collection of the of. This style is sometimes categorised as part of the ' of serif fonts (from before the eighteenth century).
(The 'a' of Plantin was not based on Granjon's work: the Plantin-Moretus Museum's type had a substitute 'a' cut later. ) Indeed, the working title of Times New Roman was 'Times Old Style'.However, Times New Roman modifies the Granjon influence further than Plantin due to features such as its 'a' and 'e', with very large, its detailing and an increased level of contrast between thick and thin strokes, so it has often been compared to fonts from the late eighteenth century, the so-called ' genre, in particular the typeface of the 1750s.
Historian and sometime Monotype executive Allan Haley commented that compared to Plantin 'serifs had been sharpened.contrast was increased and character curves were refined,' while Lawson described Times's higher-contrast crispness as having 'a sparkle Plantin never achieved.' Other changes from Plantin include a straight-sided 'M' and 'W' with three upper terminals not Plantin's four, both choices that move away from the old-style model. Italic and bold Morison described the companion as also being influenced by the typefaces created by the in the late 18th and early 19th centuries: a 'rationalistic italic that owed nothing to the tradition of the sixteenth or seventeenth centuries. It has, indeed, more in common with the eighteenth century.' Morison had several years earlier attracted attention for promoting the radical idea that in book printing were too disruptive to the flow of text, and should be phased out.
He rapidly came to concede that the idea was impractical, and later wryly commented to historian that Times' italic 'owes more to than dogma.' Morison wrote in a personal letter of Times New Roman's mixed heritage that it 'has the merit of not looking as if it had been designed by somebody in particular.' Times New Roman compared to its bold.
The bold weight has a different style, more 'nineteenth-century' in appearance, with flat serifs on the tops of letters, an effect also seen in the vertical axis of the 'o'.Rather than creating a companion with letterforms similar to the roman style, Times New Roman's bold has a different character, with a more condensed and more upright effect caused by making the horizontal parts of curves consistently the thinnest lines of each letter, and making the top serifs of letters like 'd' purely horizontal. This effect is not found in sixteenth-century typefaces (which, in any case, did not have bold versions); it is most associated with type of the early nineteenth century (and with the more recent 'Ionic' styles of type influenced by it that were offered by Linotype, discussed below). Some commentators have found Times' bold unsatisfactory and too condensed, such as. Development The Times's previous font was a design; James Mosley reports that it is the face Monotype sold as Series 7 or 'Modern Extended', based on typefaces. Now little-known, the success of its replacement has led to it sometimes being called Times Old Roman in reference to its successor and a famous cover of Monotype's trade journal Monotype Recorder which presented it under this name, although it never had this name in commercial use.
Fonts of its kind were standard in nineteenth- and early-twentieth century newspaper printing and beyond; for instance digital period typeface designer wrote that he kept his family, Exchange, designed for the based on the nineteenth-century model as it 'had to feel like the news.' However, the recent series from Linotype had recently attracted attention and was fast on the way to dominating newspaper printing worldwide; although Times New Roman does not in any way resemble it, commented that its arrival must at least have influenced the decision to consider a redesign.The development of Times New Roman was relatively involved due to the lack of a specific pre-existing model – or perhaps a surfeit of possible choices. Morison wrote in a memo that he hoped for a design that would have relatively sharp serifs, matching the general design of the Times' previous font, but on a darker and more traditional basic structure.
Bulked-up versions of Monotype's pre-existing but rather dainty and typefaces were considered for a basis, and the recent designs from Linotype, which had attracted considerable attention (and may have influenced the decision to carry out a redesign), were also examined. (Perpetua, which Monotype had recently commissioned from sculptor at Morison's urging, is considered a 'transitional' design in aesthetic, although it does not revive any specific model.) Walter Tracy, who knew Lardent, suggested in the 1980s that 'Morison did not begin with a clear vision of the ultimate type, but felt his way along.' Morison's biographer has written that Morison's memos of the time wavered over a variety of options before it was ultimately concluded that Plantin formed the best basis for a condensed font that could nonetheless be made to fill out the full size of the letter space as far as possible. (Morison ultimately conceded that Perpetua, which had been his pet project, was 'too basically circular' to be practical to condense in an attractive way. )and James Moran, who discussed the design's creation with Lardent in the 1960s, found that Lardent himself had little memory of exactly what material Morison gave him as a specimen to use to design the typeface, but he told Moran that he remembered working on the design from archive photographs of vintage type; he thought this was a book printed by; Tracy suggests that this actually might have been the same specimen of type from the Plantin-Moretus Museum that Plantin had been based on. (Although based on a type in the collection of the, which preserves much of the collection of sixteenth-century printer, Plantin is actually based specifically on a Granjon font for which matrices (moulds) only arrived in the collection after Plantin's death.
) The sharpened serifs somewhat recall Perpetua, although Morison's stated reason for them was to provide continuity with the previous Didone design and the crispness associated with the Times' printing; he also cited as a reason that sharper serifs looked better after or printed on a. Morison's several accounts of his reasoning in designing the concept of Times New Roman were somewhat contradictory and historians of printing have suggested that in practice they were mostly composed to rationalise his pre-existing aesthetic preferences. After Morison's death Allen Hutt, who had been Monotype's newspaper printing consultant, went so far as to describe his unsigned 1936 article on the topic as 'rather oddit can only be regarded as a piece of Morisonian mystification'.Lardent's original drawings are according to Rhatigan lost, but photographs exist of his drawings.
Rhatigan comments that Lardent's originals show 'the spirit of the final type, but not the details.' The design was adapted from Lardent's large drawings by the Monotype drawing office team in, which worked out spacing and simplified some fine details.
Further changes were made after manufacturing began (the latter a difficult practice, since new punches and matrices had to be machined after each design change).Morison continued to develop a close connection with the Times that would last throughout his life. Morison edited the History of the Times from 1935 to 1952, and in the post-war period, at a time when Monotype effectively stopped developing new typefaces due to, took a post as editor of the which he held from 1945 to 1948. Times New Roman remained Morison's only type design; he designed a type to be issued by the of Frankfurt but the project was abandoned due to the war. (Morison's friend Brooke Crutchley recorded in his diary being told by Morison that the test type sent to him just before the war was sent to the government to be 'analysed in order that we should know whether the Hun is hard up for lead or antimony or tin.' )Metal type versions A large number of variants of Times were cut during the metal type period, in particular families of titling capitals for headlines.
Walter Tracy in Letters of Credit, Allen Hutt and others have discussed these extensively in their works on the family. Titling Monotype also created some caps-only 'titling' designs to match Times New Roman itself, which was intended for body text. These are not sold by Monotype in digital format, although Linotype's Times Eighteen in the same style (see below) is.
Times Hever Titling from a Monotype specimen.An elegant titling caps design, quite different from Times New Roman with a A (with a serif at top left of the letter, suggesting a stroke written with a quill) and old-style C and W; Tracy suggests Monotype's previous design as an influence. Named after, the home of the Times' owner. Designed early on, it was used by the Times for section headings. It has not been digitised.Times Wide (1938, series 427) A variant intended for book printing, avoiding the slight condensation of the original Times New Roman. Although it was popular in the metal type period for book printing, it was apparently never digitised. Monotype also created a version, series 627, with long more appropriate to classic book typography.
Optional were also available.Series 727 and 827 Monotype also produced Series 727, in which the heavier strokes of upper-case letters were made slightly thinner. This was done to produce a lighter effect in which capital letters do not stand out so much, and was particularly intended for, since in the German language capitals are far more common since they appear at the start of each noun. Series 827 modified some letters (notably the R) to correspond to their appearance in other typefaces popular in French printing. This production of what are now called to suit national tastes was common at the time, and many alternates were also offered for for use in Europe. Claritas A modified 4¾ point size of Times Roman was produced by Monotype for use in printing matter requiring a very small size of type. Listed as Times Newspaper Smalls, available as either Series 333 or 335, it was also referred to by the name Claritas. Times 4-line Mathematics Series 569 This is a variant designed for printing mathematical formulae, using the 4‑line system for mathematics developed by Monotype in 1957.
This modified version of Times Roman was designed for use as part of Monotype's 4-line Mathematics system. The major changes to the Times Roman typeface itself were a reduction in the slope of italic characters to 12 degrees from 16 degrees, so as to reduce the need for kerning, and a change in the form of italic v and w so that italic v could be more easily distinguished from a Greek nu.The 4-line system involved casting characters for 10-point Times Roman on 6-point bodies. The top of the character would overhang the slug, forming a which was less fragile than the normal kerns of foundry type, as it was on a slab of cast metal. This technique had been in previous use on Monotype machines, usually involving double-height matrices, to allow the automatic setting of 'advertising figures' (numbers that occupy two or more lines, usually to clearly indicate a price in an advertisement set in small type).
This meant that the same matrix could be used for both superscript and subscript numbers. More importantly, it allowed a variable or other item to have both a superscript and a subscript at the same time, one above the other, without inordinate difficulty.Previously, while the Monotype system, due to its flexibility, was widely used for setting mathematical formulas, the typeface Modern Series 7 was usually used for this purpose. Because of the popularity of Times Roman at the time, Monotype chose to design a variant of Times Roman suited to mathematical composition, and recut many additional characters needed for mathematics, including special symbols as well as Greek and Fraktur alphabets, to accompany the system instead of designing it around the typeface that was being used, for which characters were already available. Matrices for some 700 characters were available as part of Times Roman Series 569 when it was released in 1958, with new characters constantly being added for over a decade afterwards (thus, in 1971, 8,000 characters were included, and new ones were being added at a rate of about 5 per week). A 1943 brochure used by Crowell-Collier, one of the first major American users of Times New Roman, to promote the changeover.Times New Roman's popularity rapidly expanded beyond its original niche, becoming popular in book printing and general publishing. Monotype took advantage of this popularity by commissioning a widened version, Series 427, for book publishing, although many books ultimately used the original version.An early use of Times New Roman outside its origin was by, an influential historian of printing with whom Morison carried an extensive correspondence.
Impressed by the design, he used it to set his book Some Aspects of Printing, Old and New. It then was chosen by the Crowell-Collier magazines and then its sister publications such as. A brochure was published to mark the change along with a letter from Morison hoping that the redesign would be a success., who worked on a redesign, however noted that the design's compression and fine detail extending to the edge of the was not ideal in the aggressive conditions of most newspaper printing, in which the Times was unusual for its particularly high standard of printing suiting its luxury market. Users found that in the hot metal period it was common for the molten metal to rapidly eat through the matrices as type was being cast, and so it did not become popular among other newspapers: 'Times Roman achieved its popularity chiefly in general printing, not in newspaper work.' He described it as particularly used in 'book work, especially non-fiction' such as the. Allen Hutt also commented that Times New Roman's relative condensation was less useful than might be expected for newspaper printing, since in a normal newspaper column frequent paragraph breaks tend to provide area that can absorb the space of wider letters without increasing the number of lines used–although The Times, whose in the 1930s was to minimise the number of paragraph breaks, was an exception to this.Times New Roman remains popular in publishing, helped by the extremely large range of characters available for international and mathematics printing.
For example, the suggests using Times New Roman in papers written in its. Some differences between Linotype's Times Roman and Monotype's Times New Roman typefaces.Despite Monotype's key role in creating Times New Roman, its rival rapidly began to offer the design; The Times used Linotype equipment for much of its production.
Linotype referred to the design as Times or Times Roman. Monotype and Linotype have since merged, but slight differences have split the lineage of Times into two subtly different designs.Although Times New Roman and Times are very similar, various differences developed between the versions marketed by Linotype and Monotype when the master fonts were transferred from metal to and digital media. For example, Linotype has slanted on the capital S, while Monotype's are vertical, and Linotype has an extra serif on the number 5.
Most of these differences are invisible in body text at normal reading distances, or 10pts at 300 dpi. Subtle competition grew between the two foundries, as the proportions and details as well as the width metrics for their version of Times grew apart. Vivid differences between the two versions do occur in the lowercase z in the italic weight (Times Linotype has a curl also followed in the STIX revival, Times New Roman is straight) and in the percent sign in all weights. (Linotype and STIX have a stroke connecting up the left-hand zero with a slash, Times New Roman does not.)Linotype licensed its version to and then and, guaranteeing its importance in digital printing by making it one of the core fonts of the page description language.
Microsoft's version of Times New Roman is licensed from Monotype, hence the original name. For compatibility, Monotype had to subtly redraw their design to match the widths from the Adobe/Linotype version. Versions of Times New Roman from Monotype exist which vary from the Linotype metrics (i.e. Not the same as the version for Microsoft).Linotype applied for registration of the trademark name Times Roman and received registration status in 1945. In the 1980s, there was an attempt by a group of entrepreneurs to seek from, who owned The Times, the right to use the Times Roman name; separately, a legal action was also initiated to clarify the right of Monotype to use the name in the US despite Linotype's registration. As a result of legal action, Linotype and its licensees continued to use the name Times Roman, while Monotype and its licensees used the name Times New Roman. Modern releases As Times New Roman Monotype sells a wider range of styles and for Times New Roman than are offered with Windows, in order to meet the needs of newspapers and books which print at a range of text sizes.
Its current release includes Regular, Medium, Semi Bold and Bold weights with matching italics, Extra Bold, Condensed (in regular, italic and bold), Seven (for smaller text, in regular, italic, bold and bold italic) and Small Text (for very small text, in regular, italic and bold).As of 2017, the version of Times New Roman included with, version 6.96, includes, and italic. The Microsoft/Monotype digitisation of Times New Roman omits automatic insertion (although as of v. 6.96 it is selectable), which the version of Times installed with macOS has. (This can result in unsightly character collisions if the characters 'fi' are needed.)Times New Roman World This is a version based on fonts released with. It includes fonts in character sets, Hebrew and Arabic characters. Similar to, Arabic in italic fonts are in roman positions.Linotype variants Like Monotype, Linotype released additional versions of Times for different text sizes.
These include:. Times Ten is a version specially designed for smaller text (12 point and below). It features wider characters and stronger hairlines. In 2004 prominent typeface designer said that he believed that it was the best Times New Roman digitisation then available. Times Eighteen, a headline version for point sizes of 18 and larger.
The characters are subtly condensed and the hairlines are finer. The current version has no italics, but does have a lower case (whereas some Times titling fonts were capitals only). Times Europa Office, a 2006 adaptation of the Times newspaper's 1972 design Times Europa (see below). This is a complete family of designs intended for use on poor-quality paper. The updating, created by Akira Kobayashi, contains numbers, mathematical signs,. Each character has the same advance width in all the fonts in the family so that changing from regular to bold or italic does not affect word wrap.
The Times' previous typeface from an article describing the in 1917.The Times newspaper has commissioned various successors to Times New Roman:. Times Europa was designed by in 1972 for The Times, as a sturdier alternative to the Times font family, designed for the demands of faster printing presses and cheaper paper. The typeface features more open counter spaces and a more strongly contrasting, calligraphic italic. It has been released commercially by Adobe, among others, recently in an updating by Linotype. Times Roman replaced Times Europa on 30 August 1982. Times Millennium was made in 1991, drawn by Gunnlaugur Briem on the instructions of Aurobind Patel, composing manager of News International.
Times Classic first appeared in 2001. Designed as an economical face by the British type team of Dave Farey and Richard Dawson, it took advantage of the new PC-based publishing system at the newspaper, while obviating the production shortcomings of its predecessor Times Millennium. The new typeface included 120 letters per font. Initially the family comprised ten fonts, but a condensed version was added in 2004. Times Modern was unveiled on 20 November 2006, as the successor of Times Classic. Designed for improving legibility in smaller font sizes, it uses 45-degree angled bracket serifs.
It was designed by Research Studios, led by designer with input from, deputy editor of The Times. (Other designs have been released called Times Modern; see below.)During the Times New Roman period The Times also sometimes used, also from Monotype, and one of Morison's favourite type designs from his work at Monotype. William Starling Burgess In 1994 the printing historian published claims that the design of Times New Roman’s roman or regular style was based on a 1904 design of.
This theory remains controversial. Parker and his friend, a Canadian printer who had bought up the defunct American branch of Lanston Monotype, claimed that, in 1904, Burgess created a type design for company documents at his shipyard in Marblehead, Massachusetts, and hired Lanston Monotype to issue it. However, Burgess abandoned the idea and Monotype shelved the sketches, ultimately reusing them as a basis for Times New Roman. Giampa claimed that he stumbled upon original material in 1987, after he had purchased Lanston Monotype, and that some of the papers that had been his evidence had been lost in a flood at his house, while Parker claimed that an additional source was material in a section of the Smithsonian now closed due to contamination. Giampa asked Parker to complete the type from the limited number of surviving letters, which was issued in June 2009 by under the name of 'Starling'.Reception to the claims was sceptical, with dismissal from Morison's biographer and among others; Barker suggested that the material had been fabricated in order to aid Giampa in embarrassing Monotype's British branch, while Devroye suggested that the claim had begun as a prank.
In 2010, writer Mark Owens described Parker's article in retrospect as 'the scantest of evidence' and a 'fog of irrelevant details'. Monotype executive Dan Rhatigan described the theory as implausible in 2011: 'I'll admit that I tend to side with the more fully documented (both in general, and in agreement with what little I can find within Monotype to support it) notion that Times New Roman was based on Plantin.I won't rule out the possibility that Starling Burgess drew up the concept first, but makes me doubt it.' The Times Online web site credits the design to 'Stanley Morrison, Victor Lardent and perhaps Starling Burgess'. Pelham InfantBecause of its popularity, the typeface has been influential in the subsequent development of a number of serif typefaces both before and after the start of the digital-font era. Times Modern was a condensed and bold display variant published by, among others,. It was withdrawn from sale due to trademark disputes with the Times newspaper, which owns its own unrelated design named 'Times Modern' (see above).
CG Times is a variant of Times family made by foundry. Pelham is a version of Times Roman by of Britain, which also cut an infant version with single-story versions of the letters a and g.
Press Roman, a version of Times New Roman typed on a premium IBM typewriter. In the mid-1960s, a derivative of Times New Roman known as 'Press Roman' was used as a font for the. This was an ultra-premium electric 'golfball' system, intended to be used for producing high-quality office documents or copy to be photographically enlarged for small-scale printing projects. Unlike most typewriters, the Composer produced proportional type, rather than monospaced letters. Ultimately the system proved a niche product, as it competed with increasingly cheap, and then in the 1980s was largely displaced by word processors and general-purpose computers. Among many digital-period designs loosely inspired by Times, 's popular Tiempos family is a loose Times New Roman revival; it was created for a Spanish newspaper ('tiempo' is Spanish for 'time'). Comparison between Times New Roman and Liberation Serif, showing its much squarer designTimes Roman and Times New Roman are proprietary fonts.
There are some fonts used as free Times Roman and Times New Roman alternatives or used for:. produced a version of Times New Roman called in 1982. Nimbus Roman No9 L, URW's variant, was released under the in 1996, and available in major and operating systems. Like Times New Roman, many additional styles of Nimbus Roman exist that are only sold commercially, including condensed and extra-bold styles. URW also developed Nimbus Roman No. 4, which is metrically compatible with the slightly different CG Times.
A standard Times New Roman digitisation compared to the STIX Two project, an open-source typeface for mathematics based on Times's smaller metal point sizes. STIX Two has a higher x-height and a reduction in fine detail. The is a four-style set of open-source fonts.
They were created for scientific publishing by the Scientific and Technical Information Exchange consortium of publishers, but are also very suitable for general use, including Greek and Cyrillic support. The original version is installed by default on, and adapted as. In 2016, a completely redesigned version was released by Ross Mills and John Hudson of Tiro Typeworks. Unlike the previous version, it is an original design loosely inspired by a of Times New Roman, with a higher than Monotype's Times digitisation. is metrically equivalent to Times New Roman. It was developed by Ascender Corp.
And published by Red Hat in 2007 under the GPL license with some exceptions. It is used in some GNU/Linux distributions as a default font replacement for Times New Roman. Widths aside, it does not particularly resemble Times New Roman, being much squarer in shape with less fine detail and blunt ends rather than ball terminals. Google's Tinos in the package is a derivative of Liberation Serif. is a roman-only font released by for non-commercial use, with European alphabets based on Times New Roman.
It has an expanded character range intended to cover a large proportion of for scholarly use. Bitstream no longer offers the font, but it remains downloadable from the.See also.Notes. (1930). (1930). (1930). (1931).
Leysbourne. Placard. Kino. Script. Falstaff. Inflex.
Littleworth. (1932). Zarotto/Mardersteig (1932).
Monoline Script. (1933). Jocunda (1933). (1934). Colmcille. Runic.
Menhart. Felix Titling (1934).
Van Dijck (1935). Fontana (for Collins) (1935). Grock (1935). (for the Greynog Press) (1935). (1936).
(1936). (1935-9). (for R & R Clark) (1937). (for J.M. Dent) (1937). (1937). Van Dijck (1937).
(1937). Matura (1938). Palace and Dorchester Script (1938)1940s.
![]() Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |